Shifting the Curve: Building a Stronger Future for Texas Children

On July 14, 2011 the Texas Early Learning Council hosted an
interactive Plenary Session at the Texas Early Childhood Leadership
Summit in Austin. Nearly a thousand early childhood
stakeholders, including parents, educators, center directors,
policymakers, and researchers, attended the Plenary Session.
The interactive session allowed the Council to receive critical
feedback from stakeholders about our projects.
Visit our Facebook page to see photos from the
Plenary Session.
John Gasko, Ph.D., Chair of the Council, and Don Titcombe,
Council Manager, presented information on the Council and our
ongoing and upcoming projects. Attendees were asked to answer
eight multiple-choice questions throughout the presentation, and
provide comments.
View
the PowerPoint Presentation from the Plenary Session. [ Click here for the PDF version ]
The Council received nearly 600 feedback surveys from the
Plenary Session. In addition, we received several dozen
responses to the same questions in an online survey. Feedback
from Texas early childhood stakeholders is critical to the
Council's work - we need to ensure that our projects are on track
with the needs of parents, providers, and policymakers in Texas!
Council staff has analyzed the data from the feedback surveys, and
we are pleased to present the results. Click on each question
in the interactive graphic below to view information on the survey
questions and results of the analysis.
As the Council moves forward with our projects, we will use this
information to ensure our projects will meet the needs of the early
childhood system and improve school readiness in Texas!
Plenary Session Survey Results
The Council received over 600 feedback surveys from early
childhood stakeholders in response to the 2011 Texas Early
Childhood Leadership Summit Plenary Session. As you can see
from the chart below, the responses came from a diverse audience
from across Texas. The largest respondent groups were:
providers, teachers, and educators; mentors, trainers, coaches, and
consultants; and, administrators and directors.

Because of the versatility of early childhood professionals,
many of the respondents chose multiple roles on their
surveys. For example, many respondents who work at centers
selected administrator/director, provider/teacher/educator, and
mentor/trainer/coach/consultant. To properly catalog all
responses, surveys with multiple role identification were counted
multiple times, one set of responses for each role. Therefore, in
the example above, the survey responses were counted three times,
once as an administrator/director, once as a
provider/teacher/educator, and once as a
mentor/trainer/coach/consultant.
Each survey question was analyzed individually. The
following analyses feature the full question from the original
survey, and response options. Each analysis includes charts
of the responses and the responses of the largest respondent
groups.
The first survey question followed a presentation of the
changing demographics and increasing population of our state in the
coming decades. Texas will add over a million children in the
next 30 years, an increase of over 50%, and the demographics of the
0-5 population will also change; in the next decade, Hispanics will
become the majority ethnicity of children in Texas. The
Council asked early childhood professionals to evaluate a list of
infrastructure needs, and determine the three most important needs
in their area of practice.
What are the TOP 3 infrastructure needs in your ECE area of
practice?
- Access to quality professional development
- Access to technology and data
- Access to new models of leadership and administration
- Standards and regulations
- Opportunities for collaboration and resource sharing
- Resources for serving special and underrepresented
populations
- Teacher preparation in higher education
- Funding
- Local planning
- Curriculum
- Parental outreach

According to all the survey responses, the respondents selected:
funding; access to quality professional development; and,
opportunities for collaboration and resource sharing. These
three responses comprise nearly half of all responses for this
question. The respondents selected standards and regulations,
local planning, curriculum, and access to new models of leadership
and administration as their least needed infrastructure needs.

Next, we sorted the total responses by respondent groups. The
largest respondent groups, administrators, educators, and trainers
each chose funding as their greatest infrastructure need, access to
quality professional development as their second greatest
infrastructure need, and opportunities for collaboration and
resource sharing as their third greatest infrastructure need.
Trainers valued access to quality professional development more
than all other groups, while educators valued parental outreach
more than all other groups.
The second survey question asked respondents to select the type
of early childhood data that would most help them improve outcomes
for young children. The Council is committed to improving
school readiness in Texas, and improving outcomes for young
children in school. This question followed a presentation of
the types of early childhood data currently available in Texas, and
what agencies collect, store, and use this data.
What type of data would MOST help you improve outcomes for young
children?
- Historical child data (screening results, developmental
histories, program history, etc)
- Parental data (demographics, income, etc)
- Assessment data (school readiness assessments, screenings,
etc)
- Classroom data (school readiness information, performance
tracking, classroom metrics, etc)
- Teacher/staff data (staff demographics, staff professional
development histories, etc)
- Program data (quality ratings, accreditations, services, staff
professional development histories, etc)

As illustrated in the pie chart, the respondents selected
assessment data, historical child data, and classroom data as the
most helpful types of data to help them improve outcomes for young
children. These three responses comprise 70% of all responses
to this question. Parental data and teacher/staff data were
selected least often by the respondents. Many respondents
commented on their concerns over security of parental data and
child data (both historical and assessment data). The
Council's efforts to build a comprehensive early childhood data
system, the Texas On-Track System (TOTS), are progressing with a
clear vision of data security for all contributors and users.

While the top three responses, assessment data, classroom data,
and historical child data, are still the most popular among the
largest respondent groups, the frequency of their responses in
these categories is slightly different. Trainers and teachers
value assessment data and classroom data more than administrators,
but all three groups chose historical child data at the same rate,
approximately 22%. Administrators value teacher/staff data
and program data more than all other respondent groups.
The third survey question asked respondents to select the
greatest barrier to ECE collaborations in Texas. The
Council's Collaborations and Standards Subcommittee is working
towards improving collaborations among early childhood stakeholders
to improve school readiness in Texas. This question followed
a presentation of the projects of the Subcommittee, including the
development of a online, cross-sector standards and guidelines
crosswalk tool and creating new infant and toddler early learning
guidelines for all ECE professionals.
What is the SINGLE GREATEST barrier to ECE collaboration in
Texas?
- Varying standards and regulations
- Institutional unwillingness
- Lack of communication among sectors, programs, and
institutions
- Benefit of collaboration are not apparent
- Accountability and funding challenges

Nearly 50% of all respondents selected a lack of communication
among sectors, programs, and institutions as the greatest barrier
to collaboration. Accountability and funding challenges was
the second-most selected response, followed by varying standards
and regulations. Most respondents do not consider institutional
unwillingness and unapparent benefits of collaboration to be
barriers of ECE collaboration in Texas.

Each of the three largest respondent groups, trainers, teachers,
and administrators selected a lack of communication among sectors,
programs, and institutions as the greatest barrier, followed by
accountability and funding challenges, and varying standards and
regulations. Trainers recognized more institutional
unwillingness than other groups, as well as unapparent benefits of
collaboration.
The fourth survey question followed a presentation of the
training and preparation of the ECE workforce in Texas. In
order to continually improve the ECE workforce, opportunities for
career development, higher education, high-quality trainings, and
improved standards and expectations and pay scale must be
addressed. The Council asked early childhood professionals to
evaluate a list of workforce challenges, and determine the greatest
challenge for the ECE workforce.
What is the GREATEST ECE workforce challenge in Texas?
- Pay scale
- Access to quality training
- Access to education
- Varying standards and expectations
- Varying career development pathways

Using the responses from all respondents, pay scale was the
overwhelming choice for the greatest ECE workforce challenge.
Respondents also selected access to quality training and access to
education at higher levels than other options. Together, the
top three selections comprise more than 85% of all responses.
Currently, the Council is developing a comprehensive, online
professional development system for ECE professionals in
Texas. The new professional development system will feature
resources to find trainings, higher education opportunities, and
scholarships.

We also sorted this data by the respondent's role in ECE.
Among the respondents, 50% of teachers, administrators, and
trainers each selected pay scale as the greatest challenge for the
ECE workforce. Trainers valued access to quality training
more than all other respondent groups.
The fifth survey question asked respondents to select the area
of knowledge that is most important for parents of young children
to optimize their children's development. The Council
currently hosts resources for parents on its website, and, the
Council will launch a parental outreach campaign to help parents
improve school readiness. This question followed a
presentation of the Council's plans to assess the needs of children
in our state, and then engage in targeted outreach to parents,
providers, and policymakers.
In terms of optimizing the development of young children, what
is the SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT area of knowledge for Texas
parents?
- Knowledge of brain development (social-emotional, cognitive,
physical, etc)
- Knowledge of resources and strategies
- Knowledge of in-home strategies for supporting healthy
development
- Knowledge on how to evaluate the effectiveness of a
program
- Knowledge of the effects of abuse and neglect

The respondents selected knowledge of in-home strategies for
supporting healthy development as the most important area of
knowledge for parents. Respondents also chose knowledge of
brain development and knowledge of resources and services as
important areas of knowledge for parents. The top 3 responses
comprise nearly 90% of all responses.

Because this question directly relates to knowledge of parents,
this chart shows their responses to the question, as well as the
highest respondent groups. Parents selected knowledge of
brain development as the most important knowledge area for parents
at a higher rate than other groups. All respondent groups
selected knowledge of in-home strategies for supporting healthy
development as the most important for parents. None of the
parents at the Plenary Session selected knowledge of the effects of
abuse and neglect or knowledge on how to evaluate the effectiveness
of programs.
The sixth survey question followed a presentation of the
Council's projects of the Parental Outreach and Communications
Subcommittee. One of the Subcommittee's projects is to
implement a targeted outreach campaign to assist communities and
parents to improve outcomes for young children. The Council
asked early childhood stakeholders to evaluate a list of
information and resource channels to reach parents with critical
information related to child development and access to resources
and services, and decide the three most important channels to reach
parents.
What are the THREE MOST IMPORTANT channels to reach parents with
critical information related to child development and access to
resources and services?
- Professionals that work with parents of young children
(pediatricians, ECE educators, social workers, etc)
- Radio, television, and print media
- Community "grasstop" leaders (clergy, librarians, local
politicians, etc)
- Web campaigns (videos, webpages, email, etc)
- Direct mail
- Targeted campaigns (supermarket advertising, information
embedded in utility mailings, etc)
- Direct efforts (community organizing, PTA, resource fairs,
community development efforts, etc)
- Parenting classes

Among all respondents, the three most important channels to
reach parents were: professionals that work with parents of young
children; direct efforts; and, radio, television, and print
media. Direct mail was only selected by 4% of respondents,
and web campaigns had a similarly low response rate. The
Council and the Parental Outreach and Communications Subcommittee
will use this information to inform the development and
implementation of our targeted outreach campaign in the near
future.

Each of the three highest respondent groups, trainers, teachers,
and administrators, selected professionals that work with parents
of young children as the most important channel to reach parents,
followed by direct efforts and radio, television, and print
media. However, parents selected direct efforts, such as
resource fairs and community organizing, as the most important
channel to reach parents. Parents selected web campaigns at
even lower rates than other respondents, preferring face-to-face
and traditional outreach materials.
The seventh survey question asked respondents to select the most
significant barrier to engaging in ongoing, high-quality
professional development for ECE professionals. The Council's
Workforce and Professional Development Subcommittee is working
towards improving the ECE workforce in Texas to improve school
readiness for Texas children. This survey question followed a
presentation of the Subcommittee's projects, including the new
professional development system.
What is the MOST SIGNIFICANT barrier for ECE professionals in
continuing to engage in ongoing, high-quality professional
development?
- Limited time to engage in high-quality professional development
opportunities
- Limited personal funds to pay for high-quality professional
development opportunities
- Limited program funds to pay for high-quality professional
development opportunities
- Limited access to high-quality professional development
opportunities
- A lack of political and public policy support for high-quality
professional development opportunities

Early childhood stakeholders selected limited program funds as
the most significant barrier for ECE professionals seeking
high-quality professional development. Limited personal funds
and a lack of political and public policy support for high-quality
professional development were also selected as significant barriers
for ECE professionals. Only 8% of respondents selected
limited access to high-quality professional development as a
barrier, suggesting that most ECE stakeholders are able to access
high-quality professional development.

Both teachers and trainers selected limited program funds, limited
personal funds, and a lack of political and public policy support
as the most significant barriers to high-quality professional
development. However, administrators selected limited time as
their second most significant barrier to professional
development. More teachers selected limited personal funds
for professional development, which may also be related to the high
number of responses selecting pay scale as the greatest ECE
workforce challenge.
The final question followed a presentation of the projects of
the Data and Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS)
Subcommittee. The Council is currently developing
recommendations for a Texas QRIS, a system to rate the quality of
ECE programs and assist programs with quality improvement.
Early childhood stakeholders evaluated a list of problems and
challenges in ECE in Texas, and selected the problem or challenge
that will most likely be solved if Texas were to have a QRIS.
What problem or challenge is a QRIS MOST LIKELY to solve?
- Child outcomes
- Program development
- Parent knowledge
- Funding decisions
- Unifying standards and regulations

Early childhood stakeholders selected program development as the
problem or challenge that a Texas QRIS would be most likely to
solve. Unifying standards and regulations was the second
problem most likely to be solved by a QRIS, followed by funding
decisions. Parent knowledge was selected by only 5% of
respondents.

The three largest respondent groups each selected program
development as the challenge most likely to be solved by a Texas
QRIS. They also selected unifying standards and regulations
and funding decisions as the second and third challenge most likely
to be solved by a QRIS.